Conduction-Dominated Geothermal Systems
Conduction-Dominated Geothermal Systems
Moeck-Beardsmore Play Types
Conduction dominated geothermal systems are considered ‘passive’ because no convective flow of fluids or short-term variations in fluid dynamics exist. No recent tectonism exists in these areas thus depending on an increase of temperature with depth. Economic viability is closely linked to the geothermal gradient. Since no active tectonics exists, heat sources are located at greater depth than in convection dominated systems. [1]
Conduction dominated systems are subdivided into three play types based on the natural porosity-permeability ratio within the potential reservoir rock, and the absence or presence of producible natural reservoir fluid.[1] These three plays are intracratonic basin plays, orogenic belt and foreland basin plays, and crystalline rock/basement plays. Some areas, such as those with low permeability potential reservoirs can only be developed using engineered geothermal systems (EGS).
Examples
Want to add an example to this list? Select a Geothermal Resource Area to edit its "Moeck-Beardsmore Play Type" property using the "Edit with Form" option.
Geothermal Resource Area | Geothermal Region | Play Type | Control Structure | Host Rock Age | Host Rock Lithology | Mean Capacity | Mean Reservoir Temp |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Birdsville Geothermal Area | Australia - Great Artesian Basin | CD-1: Intracratonic Basin | Sandstone | 0.8 MW800 kW <br />800,000 W <br />800,000,000 mW <br />8.0e-4 GW <br />8.0e-7 TW <br /> | 371.15 K98 °C <br />208.4 °F <br />668.07 °R <br /> | ||
Fenton Hill HDR Geothermal Area | Rio Grande Rift | CD-3: Crystalline Rock - Basement | Lithologically Controlled | Precambrian | Crystalline basement “pCu” (undifferentiated in map units); Biotite Granodiorite (Phase I Reservoir); Gneiss, Schist, Granodiorite, Granite, Metavolcanic Rocks (Phase II Reservoir) | 20 MW20,000 kW <br />20,000,000 W <br />20,000,000,000 mW <br />0.02 GW <br />2.0e-5 TW <br /> | 508.15 K235 °C <br />455 °F <br />914.67 °R <br /> |
Garching Geothermal Area | Germany Geothermal Region | CD-2: Orogenic Belt | 2 MW2,000 kW <br />2,000,000 W <br />2,000,000,000 mW <br />0.002 GW <br />2.0e-6 TW <br /> | ||||
Innamincka SA | South Austrailia | CD-3: Crystalline Rock - Basement | 1 MW1,000 kW <br />1,000,000 W <br />1,000,000,000 mW <br />0.001 GW <br />1.0e-6 TW <br /> | 551.15 K278 °C <br />532.4 °F <br />992.07 °R <br /> | |||
Neustadt-Glewe Geothermal Area | North German Basin | CD-1: Intracratonic Basin | 343.15 K70 °C <br />158 °F <br />617.67 °R <br /> | ||||
Unterhaching Geothermal Area | Molasse Basin - Foreland basin of the alps | CD-2: Orogenic Belt | Jurrasic | Limestone | 395.15 K122 °C <br />251.6 °F <br />711.27 °R <br /> |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Inga S. Moeck,Graeme Beardsmore. 2014. A New 'Geothermal Play Type' Catalog: Streamlining Exploration Decision Making. In: Proceedings. Thirty-Ninth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering; 2014/02/24; Stanford, California. Stanford, California: Stanford University; p. 8
- ↑ Inga Moeck. 2013. Geothermal Plays in Geologic Settings. In: IGA Workshop on Developing Best Practice for Geothermal Exploration and Resource/Reserve Classification; 2013/11/14; Essen, Germany. IGA website: International Geothermal Association; p. 19